An Eclectic Set of Academic Musings-

An Eclectic Set of Academic Musings-

Friday, June 21, 2013

Erasmus of Rotterdam Skewers Conversion By The Sword


    Erasmus of Rotterdam has been dubbed as an ambivalent Christian for his voiced frustrations with the military habits of the Christian empire.  Born within the Spanish manifestation of the Roman Catholic Church’s inquisition, the ordained Erasmus detested how Christianity was being practiced. Erasmus viewed the Church’s self-proclaimed ‘holy fight against heretics’ as a brutal prosecution of peaceable non-believers. The pious philosopher was concerned with the hypocrisy that lay between Christian teachings and Christian actions. Erasmus saw no forgiveness, no turning of the cheek in the inquisition and passionately advocated against it, as he believed it did not spread Jesus’s message of love and forgiveness.
The predominant school of thought accepted in Erasmus’s time was dictated mainly by readings of the ancients (philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle who made significant contributions to the development of Just War Theory), from which were born the ideas of Christian philosophers such as Thomas Aquinus.  Aristotle, a famous formative influence of just war theory, hints towards the necessity of a just cause to war, one such cause being self-defense. He states, “…defenders should make use of any means of defense which may have been discovered, and should devise and invent others…”[1] This rational paved the way for Aquinus to further develop just war theory. In his book “Summa theologiae” Aquinus addresses whether or not it is always sinful to wage war. And he decided it is not. Aquinus puts forward his beliefe that, “In order for a war to be just, three things are required. First, the authority of the prince by whose command the war is to be waged. …Secondly, a just cause is required…Thirdly, it is necessary that those waging war should have rightful intention, so that they intend the advancement of good, or the avoidance of evil…”[2]  While ideas developed by Aquinus appear reasonable to most, Erasmus is having none of it. He discredits all justifications of war saying, “…even the momost just of wars brings with it a train of evils…”[1]
Erasmus supports a movement away from the ancients and pushes against Aquinus’ just war theories due in majority, to his observation of the Church’s use of Just War Theory as justification for violence and even as a motivation to war.  Erasmus holds that using violence to convert ‘evil’ non-believers or heretics is more likely to make the Christians evil, than it is to make the non-believers Christian. Erasmus does not view war as a Christian thing to do, even if it is to protect or maintain the faith, as Christianity was established on a foundation of peace. He states, “Perhaps it should not be defended by other means than those which created and spread it” Erasmus instead advocates pacifism as Christian behavior, as he believes this is what Jesus would do.


[1] Erasmus, “The Education of a Christian Prince” On Starting War (p.235 EWP text)

[1] Aristotle, Politics, bk. VII, chap. 11 (p.42 in EWP textbook)
[2] Aquinus, Thomas. “Summa theologiae” Question 40, article 1. (p.176 EWP text)
[3] Erasmus, “The Education of a Christian Prince” On Starting War (p.235 EWP text)

No comments:

Post a Comment